deflation

Liquidity Problems Could Overwhelm Inflation’s Effects

by

LIQUIDITY PROBLEMS – 1929 

In 1928 and 1929, the Fed raised interest rates for the purpose of curbing rampant speculation in stocks. At that time, investors could borrow as much as 90% of the stock price for their proposed investment. The banks were just as aggressive as investors and were happy to oblige.

Raising rates did not slow stock speculation by investors or banks, however.

What it did do was cause a slowdown in economic activity. Thus, as economic activity declined, the stock market continued its rise, unabated.

As the decline in economic activity continued, both businesses and consumers were affected negatively. The money was available for investors to buy more stocks, albeit at a higher cost; but, businesses and consumers struggled with liquidity problems.

STOCK BUBBLE BURSTS 

The crash in the stock market brought illiquidity issues to light. Layoffs in the financial industry were numerous and swift. The ranks of the unemployed ballooned.

If you were an investor who had purchased stock with 10% down, it would take only a 20% decline for you to have lost twice as much as your original investment.

Now, imagine the plight of the banks who had lent money to investors using stocks as collateral. The collateral was worth as much as 30% less after one day of trading. Bank failures became almost commonplace during the Great Depression that followed.

FED RESPONSE

As might be expected, the Fed did purchase government securities in the open market and lowered the discount rate. It also assured commercial banks that it would supply needed reserves.

Unfortunately, “too little; too late” became the common descriptive phrase used when referring to Federal Reserve response to the crisis which it had caused. That is because the economic devastation was overwhelming.

Unemployment soared to as much as 25% and prices declined (deflation) by more than one-third. The aggressive, free-spending social programs of the 1930s government could not stop the slide and contributed to the length and breadth of the depression. At the depths of the Great Depression in 1932, the stock market had declined by 90%.

The stock market crash was not the cause of the Great Depression, though. The Great Depression was caused by a Fed policy of higher interest rates. Whatever the intention or merits of the action (the higher rates were imposed for the purpose of curbing rampant stock speculation), it led to a reduction in economic activity which was well underway before stocks crashed.

INFLATION, DEFLATION, AND THE FED 

The Federal Reserve officially implemented an interest rate policy of “higher for longer” almost three years ago. Rates moved up rapidly and bond prices have lost one-third to one-half of their value since then, depending on length of maturity. (see “And So Rates Will Be Higher” – Jerome Powell)

It matters not what the intention was or whether it was correct. What matters at this point are the circumstances in which the Fed finds itself now.

Most, or all, of our serious financial and economic problems are the result of a century of intentional inflation. The effects of that inflation lead to a loss of purchasing power in the currency (U.S. dollar). When the Fed intervenes in the markets either directly (by purchasing or selling securities) or indirectly (manipulating interest rates), it creates distortions which have ripple effects and are amplified.

In addition, those effects are unknown with regards to extent, duration, and timing. Remember being surprised at the higher increases in consumer prices post-Covid and economic shutdown. Those increases are attributable to government (and central banks) actions in response to the ‘pandemic’.

The economic shutdown was forced upon society by government – rightly or wrongly. As a result, the decline in economic activity led to huge financial and economic problems for society, including supply chain issues. These problems were met with phenomenally huge financial largesse (inflation) by governments and central banks, which, in turn, led to higher consumer prices (effects of inflation).

After more than one hundred years of trial and error, it is apparent that…

  1. The Federal Reserve causes the problems and crises with which it continues to grapple.
  2. The Fed is doomed to a role of reacting to crises of varying intensity (worse) and frequency (more often).
  3. Serious deflation and economic depression would overwhelm efforts by government to reverse the effects or contain the damage.

CONCLUSION 

There is no path to financial stability from the current point that does not involve a cleansing of huge magnitude. The cleansing will be accompanied by serious financial and economic pain. The Fed is continually dancing with its own devils amid music which is horribly out of tune. The only option left is to wait until the music stops. (also see If The Markets Turn Quickly, How Bad Can Things Get? )

Kelsey Williams is the author of two books: INFLATION, WHAT IT IS, WHAT IT ISN’T, AND WHO’S RESPONSIBLE FOR IT and ALL HAIL THE FED

Backtalk From The Bond Market

by

BACKTALK FROM THE BOND MARKET

Investors keep looking to the Fed for supposed “forward guidance”. They are looking in the wrong place. Since mid-December, bond prices have declined another 5% and are currently at new 52-week lows. Here is an updated chart of U.S. Treasury Bond ETF (TLT)…

U.S. Treasury bond prices have now declined 16% since the Fed announced a reversal in its interest rate policy and the first rate cut last September. The latest weakness comes in the face of a second rate cut, so it begs a repeat of the question I posed last October…
“Why are bond rates rising at the very time the Fed is trying to move interest rates lower?” (Fed Cuts Rates But Bond Rates Are RISING)
Subsequently, the Fed announced a second rate cut, but the announcement lacked the conviction that inflation is under control and that multiple rate cuts could be expected for 2025.
I don’t so much think the Fed has suddenly had a change of heart. The situation is precarious and the cumulative effects of more than full century of money creation (inflation), mis-management, and manipulation have evolved into a game of playing catch with a ticking time bomb.
Former Fed presidents Greenspan, Bernanke, and Yellen all know this and have kicked the can down the road. Jerome Powell was likely aware of the ongoing threat of a catastrophe from which there is no return. The opportunity to be “numero uno” for a season, however, must have displaced any fear of presiding over a credit collapse and economic depression.
THE FED’S DILEMMA

The Federal Reserve doesn’t know what to do; but it probably doesn’t make much difference anymore.

A dilemma is “a situation in which a difficult choice has to be made between two or more alternatives, especially equally undesirable ones.” (New Oxford American Dictionary)

We are hooked on low interest rates and the drug of cheap and easy credit. Maintaining low interest rates furthers that dependency and heightens the risk of overdose. The result would be a swift and renewed weakening of the U.S. dollar accompanied by the increasing effects of inflation.

On the other hand, raising interest rates more could trigger another credit implosion which could lead to deflation and a full-scale depression.

Doing nothing is an option. The problem is that the Fed is holding that “ticking time bomb” and doesn’t know how long it will be until its world blows apart.

WHAT TO EXPECT NEXT

Don’t trouble yourself worrying about who the next Fed chair will be. It doesn’t matter. It is too late in the game for a change to have any meaningful impact. This includes speculation that Judy Shelton might get nominated again. Yes, she is an excellent choice; and, for all of the right reasons.

Unfortunately, that would expose the game of chess being played by the Federal Reserve and its owners. (see Federal Reserve – Conspiracy Or Not? and Federal Reserve vs. Judy Shelton)

The worst possibilities come after something big happens. The Federal Reserve and the U.S. government will work together to stave off any possibility of loss of control. That means that everyone – investors,  traders, citizens, communities – will be subject to a host of new economic and monetary regulations, restrictions, executive orders, etc.

It will be like nothing we have seen in the past and beyond anything we can currently comprehend. (also see Bond Investors To The Fed – “Not This Time”)

Kelsey Williams is the author of two books: INFLATION, WHAT IT IS, WHAT IT ISN’T, AND WHO’S RESPONSIBLE FOR IT and ALL HAIL THE FED

 

Global Credit Collapse Is Deflationary

by

NOTE TO READERS:  “Global Credit Collapse Is Deflationary” was originally published as an exclusive for TalkMarkets on October 29, 2024. I have not changed anything in the article, nor is there any reason to modify or alter what is written below because of U.S. election results.

Read more

Viewing Gold In Its Proper Context

by

Viewing gold in its proper context seems to be difficult for most gold bugs. The excitement associated with anticipation of gold at $3000, $10,000, or higher tends to overide real fundamentals and common sense.

Not a few of the predictions for a new, higher gold price are just wild guesses. Some of the reasons given to support those guesses include a Fed pivot and reduction in interest rates, geopolitical concerns, a recession and weak economic activity, and a collapse in the U.S. dollar. There are others, but for now, lets look at these.

GOLD AND INTEREST RATES 

Financial writers in the media continue to refer to “gold’s correlation with interest rates”. The theory is that higher interest rates are negative for gold (the gold price) because gold doesn’t pay interest. Hence, investors tend to shun gold when interest rates are rising and look elsewhere for a higher return.

Time and again, the following statement or something similar finds its way into gold commentary:

“…prospects of higher US interest rates have the ability to limit upside gains. It must be kept in mind that Gold is a zero-yielding asset that tends to lose its allure in a high-interest rate environment”  

A variation of that statement:

“Because gold doesn’t bear interest, it struggles to compete when interest rates rise.” 

The statements imply a correlation between gold and interest rates. The implied correlation suggests that higher interest rates result in lower gold prices, however…

Between 1970 and 1980, the price of gold increased from $35.00 per ounce to $850.00 per ounce. Rather than declining, though, interest rates were rapidly rising.

Gold galloped ahead in the face of ever higher interest rates and increasing lack of demand for higher-yielding investments including U.S. Treasury Bonds. The 10-year U.S. Treasury bond yield exceeded 15%!!! This contrasts markedly from what happened thirty years later.

During the ten-year period 2001-2011, the price of gold increased from $275.00 per ounce to a high of almost $1900.00 per ounce. Yet, interest rates, which had been declining since the 1980s, continued  their descent (helped along by the Fed, of course).

Two ten-year periods of outsized gains in the price of gold while interest rates were doing something exactly opposite during each period. There is no correlation between gold and interest rates.

GOLD AND GEOPOLITICAL CONCERNS 

Any apparent effects from geopolitical issues are temporary at best, and there is no reason to expect them to have any measurable or lasting impact on the gold price unless the U.S. dollar is affected negatively.

(See my article The Gold Price And Geopolitical Concerns for examples; i.e., Russia vs. Ukraine, Israel vs. Hamas, The War with Iraq, etc.).

GOLD AND RECESSION FEARS

A recession is a period of weak economic activity. Even a severe recession will not have an appreciable effect on the gold price.

If the recession deepens and economic activity declines severely,  the result could be a full-scale depression.

In most cases, events of this nature are accompanied by deflation. Deflation is the opposite of inflation and results in a stronger currency (USD) which gains in purchasing power.

The gain in purchasing power means you can buy more with your dollars – not less. The downside is that there are fewer dollars to go around. There would be a huge price collapses in prices for all assets, investments, goods and services. The gold price would be similarly affected.

GOLD AND DOLLAR COLLAPSE 

There are expectations by some for a complete collapse in the U.S. dollar resulting in hyperinflation; similar to Germany in the 1920s, Zimbabwe, or Venezuela.

That is possible, but it is unlikely.  A credit collapse and deflation are more likely since the Federal Reserve fuels inflation with cheap credit. A credit collapse would trigger huge price declines in all assets, including gold. The most likely result would be a full-scale depression that could last for years.

Even if the U.S. dollar were to collapse, the price of gold in dollars would be meaningless.

VIEWING GOLD IN ITS PROPER CONTEXT 

Gold is real money and a long-term store of value. It is also original money. Gold was money before the U.S. dollar and all paper currencies; and, all paper currencies are substitutes for gold, i.e., real money.

The higher price of gold over time reflects the ongoing loss of purchasing power in the U.S. dollar. In other words, the price of gold tells us nothing about gold.

The gold price tells us only what has happened to the U.S. dollar. The same thing is true if gold is priced in any other fiat currency.

Over the past century, the dollar has lost ninety-nine percent of its purchasing power. This means that it costs one hundred times more for the things you buy today than it would absent the effects of inflation.

The original fixed price of gold was $20.67 oz. Convertibility allowed exchange of $20.00 in paper money for one ounce of gold and vice versa.

At $2000 oz., gold today is one hundred times higher and reflects the actual ninety-nine percent loss of USD purchasing power.

The gold price only moves higher to reflect the dollar’s loss of purchasing power after the fact;  never before.

Expectations for a much higher gold price based on anything other than the loss of U.S. dollar purchasing power will not be realized.

A much higher gold price can only present itself after further, significant loss of U.S. dollar purchasing power.

Kelsey Williams is the author of two books: INFLATION, WHAT IT IS, WHAT IT ISN’T, AND WHO’S RESPONSIBLE FOR IT and ALL HAIL THE FED!

Destruction Of Money Keeps Inflation In Check

by

DESTRUCTION OF MONEY 

The “biggest collapse in the money supply since the Great Depression” continues unabated at this point. (See Ryan McMaken’s article here.)

The decline in the money supply is nearly three years old and dates back to April 2021.

This decline is a destruction of money and is the opposite of what might be expected if one is looking for evidence that could support some of the more extreme expectations and projections for inflation and its effects.

That is because most, if not all, of the analysis about inflation and its effects focuses on the supply of money and its seemingly unlimited growth.

Discussion about money creation by governments and central banks almost universally excludes mention of the demand for money.

DEMAND FOR MONEY 

Money has a demand side, too. We are not talking about the demand for goods and services. We are talking about the demand for money, itself. People need money to pay taxes and transact business; to save and invest.

As long as the supply of money is relatively stable and sufficient to finance existing normal economic activity, then the result is price stability. Without price stability, the economy cannot function reasonably.

Since the inception of the Federal Reserve, excessive growth in the money supply has led to a ninety-nine percent loss of purchasing power in the U.S. dollar.

Currently, though, the money supply is not growing. It is shrinking.

A SHRINKING MONEY SUPPLY 

A shrinking money supply is directly opposite to that which has happened which has made the U.S. dollar nearly worthless compared to a century ago.

It is also not supportive to arguments that the U.S. dollar is about to collapse and that hyperinflation is on the way.

Without the continual infusions of “new” money,  the previous inflationary “highs” cannot be maintained, let alone increased.

If a shrinking money supply continues, the end result is deflation. (see An End To Inflation – Three Possibilities)

WHAT IS DEFLATION? 

Deflation is the exact opposite of inflation. The result is a stronger currency. Instead of losing purchasing power, your dollars would buy more – not less.

Deflation is not bad. However, some of the accompanying economic effects would be very difficult to endure. The U.S. dollar would go further, but there would be fewer dollars to go around.

There would be huge price reductions in real and financial asset prices, depressed economic activity and high unemployment. Conditions would rival and probably exceed those of the Great Depression of the 1930s.

Fortunately, at least for now, we are not there yet.

CONCLUSION 

An infusion of new money might temporarily reverse the shrinking money supply and its negative economic effects, but that is not necessarily a good thing.

Think of it this way. Would you recommend a new fix to a drug addict who is undergoing withdrawal symptoms resulting from curtailing their drug use and attempting a return to sobriety?

Intentional inflation by government and central banks in the form of cheap and easy credit has created artificial financial highs, bubbles in asset prices, and a false sense of economic security.

You cannot ignore fundamental financial and economic law forever. Sooner or later (more likely sooner), we will all pay the price. (also see Gold And The Shrinking Money Supply)

Kelsey Williams is the author of two books: INFLATION, WHAT IT IS, WHAT IT ISN’T, AND WHO’S RESPONSIBLE FOR IT and ALL HAIL THE FED!

 

Demand For Money Could Cause Deflation

by

 BANKING CRISIS = LIQUIDITY CRISIS = DEMAND FOR MONEY

Events this past week are indicative of what could be a more formidable problem for the Fed, investors, and the economy. Before we talk about that, lets first emphasize the key point made in my article SVB, MMT, TNT.

What happened at Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and now, Credit Suisse and First Republic banks, are not individual issues. All of them are the obvious signs of banking system fragility due to the practice of fractional-reserve banking. Therefore…

What has been termed a banking crisis is actually a liquidity crisis; and the loss of liquidity translates to a DEMAND for money.

Read more

Default – Deflation – Depression

by

DEFAULT – DEFLATION – DEPRESSION

Inflation is the primary game plan of governments and central banks. Its effects have left their mark on societies throughout history. As the effects of inflation continue to dominate headlines, financial and economic activity is scrutinized and analyzed with the intent of planning, projecting, and predicting it.

Most people think they understand inflation – they don’t – but for now, let’s look the other way. There is a triple-decker bus coming straight at us.

Read more

No Fear Of Inflation; Threat Of Deflation

by

FED HAS NO FEAR OF INFLATION

The Fed wants to have their cake and eat it too, but the cake is stale. Jerome Powell’s remarks in testimony before the Senate recently provoked considerable attention.

Responses, interpretation, and analysis by observers were many and varied. Unfortunately, no one learned anything different from what they thought they knew before Powell’s testimony.

The Fed is well aware of the problem. It is systemic in nature and goes far beyond corporate due diligence, bank liquidity, and the safety of your broker.

Most everyone else (with the exception of Janet Yellen, Ben Bernanke, and Alan Greenspan) thinks they understand the problem, but their limited understanding doesn’t allow for the subtleties of Fed Chair behavior.

Read more

Asset Price Crash Dead Ahead

by

An All-Asset Price Crash (AAPC) might be the next “Wow! Can you believe it?”

In the meantime, whether it be stocks, bonds, gold, or oil, investors are licking their chops and counting their profits before they are booked. And, they have reason to gloat. Let’s see what all the noise is about.

Read more

Cash Is King Right Now, Not Gold

by

CASH IS KING FOR NOW

Amidst the fallout of stock markets crashing worldwide, gold (silver, too) and oil imploding, and the scare of coronavirus, the dollar itself stands tall. That is not what some were expecting. Nevertheless, unrealistic expectations abound today, so let’s see what we can learn from this.

When investors sell en masse, they generally turn to cash as a resting place for their money. Cash for most people today still means US dollars. This implies an increase in demand for US dollars.  Gold investors and their advisors seem to have been expecting just the opposite.

Read more